<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CFP Buzz at CATO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cfp2009.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=27" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cfp2009.org/wordpress/?p=27</link>
	<description>Computers Freedom and Privacy Conference 2009, Creating the Future</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2021 18:05:29 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JonPincus</title>
		<link>http://www.cfp2009.org/wordpress/?p=27&#038;cpage=1#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>JonPincus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfp2009.org/wordpress/?p=27#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Brett, you&#039;ll be delighted to hear that the program committee still contains a lot of the people you derided last year as a cabal of ideologues!

Susan did a great job moderating last year&#039;s opening plenary.  This year, the first session&#039;s on Security and freedom in the Obama administration, and she&#039;s starting it off with remarks in her role as Special Advisor to the President on Science and Technology Policy.  Why on earth is that a bad thing?

jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett, you&#8217;ll be delighted to hear that the program committee still contains a lot of the people you derided last year as a cabal of ideologues!</p>
<p>Susan did a great job moderating last year&#8217;s opening plenary.  This year, the first session&#8217;s on Security and freedom in the Obama administration, and she&#8217;s starting it off with remarks in her role as Special Advisor to the President on Science and Technology Policy.  Why on earth is that a bad thing?</p>
<p>jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett Glass</title>
		<link>http://www.cfp2009.org/wordpress/?p=27&#038;cpage=1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett Glass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cfp2009.org/wordpress/?p=27#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Jim is right. It&#039;s clear from the conference&#039;s agenda that it is about computers and privacy, but not at all about freedom. Keynote speaker Susan Crawford, for example, has as a key element of her agenda onerous regulation or even nationalization of the Internet. Not exactly ideas that comport with the  notion of freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim is right. It&#8217;s clear from the conference&#8217;s agenda that it is about computers and privacy, but not at all about freedom. Keynote speaker Susan Crawford, for example, has as a key element of her agenda onerous regulation or even nationalization of the Internet. Not exactly ideas that comport with the  notion of freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
